Komuno, come back!
Going to school recently, I witnessed an interesting conversation. Yes, I know it is not nice eavesdrop, but I try not to do so going by bus in such a crowd, the sweat is just like air, the common good. I assure you - you can not, the more so, and the conversation was interesting. Cyd Charisse
Anyway, I heard an elderly woman, dressed for the reliability of the image in a fairly posh coat and painted like a painting by Picasso, complained to the present times. Her interlocutor (unfortunately I could not see her because I did not want me to turn around) every now and then acquiesced in the statement - it was better under communism. Damn, something has to be, since people power century, more experienced and better familiar with the life of such obstinacy is a repeat ... Patsy Cline
want candy?
Maybe it was actually better? These miners, for example - the communist state's economy is based on extensive industrialization, it is expensive and energy requirements. Is a job.
And if it is work and money. Ah! How much of that was! So much, that a citizen does not even wonder what to buy - just entered the store and everything was ransomed. And even when he was a laborer! Ho ho! Claudette Colbert
But even this teacher biedula had a well - and how their odfajkował had red legitkę it could do what he wanted with the kids around the first of May.
Not like today - to plod with gówniarzami and could not even applied in the name of justice szczylowi socialist!
But let us calm professions. Let's look at power. There is even a luxury. There is no użerania of laws. Bo and how? Since the "Tribune of the People" knew better, and it follows that 'or magazines' were not needed. Moreover - and this would be calm, I just came to call on the carpet for Moscow. And there, as you know, magazines are using the kindling.
Just as power was unanimous and so people were in solidarity, right? Joan Crawford
Where there someone in the head of capitalism was! It was enough that the power quietly fights! Everything was so simple, transparent. Normally, almost like a two-party system in the United States or Great Britain. Only that somehow the other party to power, she could not cram ... But it drobniuteńki pimple, right? Important was the same idea. Our Lady, the resistors in the lapels. Besides those at the top and so well ruled. I do not even have to be frequently changed and combined with lifetime pensions for themselves ... Why? Dorothy Dandridge
In the end everyone had this benefit. Society - entertainment and wealth, because she cared about the condition of the power of citizens (between the slalom course with a trainer śmietnikami MO), their intellectual entertainment (Forefathers' Eve, and so are meaningless, difficult to understand, so why run?) And simplicity of life (what to to buy the vinegar or Warsaw?).
West also had the benefit of us! Really! And you think that these loans are Gierek was in solidarity with the idea of \u200b\u200bLenin? I suppose so ... Gierek as much as he ... Bette Davis
... go the Gierek ...
Press also was good. Really, only envy! So many uncomfortable subjects dropped out! The power was good, then it could be praise. Windy optimism!
And West? Fe! Only Colorado and threw a threatened freedom of speech there. What is it whom? Anyway - after all, you can freely criticize them, so freedom was.
... he will give you ... Ellen DeGeneres
good finish, because more censorship does not exceed ... I mean, because under communism were so good that I do not even need to describe. And even if you need it's still not too long because I still think that I am intelligent and take cards. And then I'll podcierał? Bierut's portrait?
... kick ass and papa!
It was cool to be communist, right?
0 comments:
Post a Comment